Cellular accumulation of misfolded proteins is a hallmark of ageing. In young cells, the proteostasis network limits toxicity by activating one or more systems for misfolded protein clearance. We focus on how these clearance systems are integrated within the network to maintain proteome health during youth, and how their dis-integration contributes to cellular senescence—another ageing hallmark with strong links to chronic inflammation and organismal frailty.
We currently use two evolutionarily distant cell types—budding yeast and primary human fibroblasts—to identify common, conserved lines of communication between different clearance systems of the proteostasis network, and how these get re-wired during replicative ageing (yeast) and senescence (mammals). Our lab employs multi-disciplinary approaches such as super-resolution imaging, flow cytometry, and mass-spectrometry-based proteomics to measure proteostasis capacity and senescence phenotypes as quantitatively and robustly as possible. As proteostasis modulators hold therapeutic promise in ageing-associated pathologies—with renewed interest in ‘senolytics’ specifically targeting senescent cells—we hope to drive fundamental discoveries that have a direct impact on promoting lifelong health.
We use a multi-disciplinary approach (left panel), using high-resolution imaging, flow cytometry, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics, to probe the relationship between loss of proteostasis and onset of senescence—two of the hallmarks of ageing (middle—adapted from Lopéz-OtÃn et al., 2013). Our current focus is on the interplay between different protein clearance systems in young vs. senescent cells (right).
Check out Rahul’s talk from Methuselah Health UK’s Conference on Why We Age (2020), entitled “Why we turnover our proteins (and how it gets done)"
Harvey E. Johnston, Kranthikumar Yadav, Joanna M. Kirkpatrick, George S. Biggs, David Oxley, Holger B. Kramer, Rahul S. Samant
Rahul S. Samant, Silvia Batista, Mark Larance, Bugra Ozer, Christopher I. Milton, Isabell Bludau, Laura Biggins, Simon Andrews, Alexia Hervieu, View Harvey E. Johnston, Bissan Al-Lazikhani, Angus I. Lamond, Paul A. Clarke, Paul Workman
Temporal control is central to deploy and coordinate genetic programs during development. At present, there is limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern the duration and speed of developmental processes. Timing mechanisms may run in parallel and/or interact with each other to integrate temporal signals throughout the organism. In this piece, we consider findings on the extrinsic control of developmental tempo and discuss the intrinsic roles of cell cycle, metabolic rates, protein turnover, and post-transcriptional mechanisms in the regulation of tempo during neural development.
Regulation of transcription is central to the emergence of new cell types during development, and it often involves activation of genes via proximal and distal regulatory regions. The activity of regulatory elements is determined by transcription factors (TFs) and epigenetic marks, but despite extensive mapping of such patterns, the extraction of regulatory principles remains challenging.
Obesity is associated with increased ovarian inflammation and the establishment of leptin resistance. We presently investigated the role of impaired leptin signalling on transcriptional regulation in granulosa cells (GCs) collected from genetically obese mice. Furthermore, we characterised the association between ovarian leptin signalling, the activation of the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and macrophage infiltration in obese mice. After phenotype characterisation, ovaries were collected from distinct group of animals for protein and mRNA expression analysis: (i) mice subjected to a diet-induced obesity (DIO) protocol, where one group was fed a high-fat diet (HFD) and another a standard chow diet (CD) for durations of 4 or 16Â weeks; (ii) mice genetically deficient in the long isoform of the leptin receptor (ObRb; db/db); (iii) mice genetically deficient in leptin (ob/ob); and (iv) mice rendered pharmacologically hyperleptinemic (LEPT). Next, GCs from antral follicles isolated from db/db and ob/ob mice were subjected to transcriptome analysis. Transcriptional analysis revealed opposing profiles in genes associated with steroidogenesis and prostaglandin action between the genetic models, despite the similarities in body weight. Furthermore, we observed no changes in the mRNA and protein levels of NLRP3 inflammasome components in the ovaries of db/db mice or in markers of M1 and M2 macrophage infiltration. This contrasted with the downregulation of NLRP3 inflammasome components and M1 markers in ob/ob and 16-wk HFD-fed mice. We concluded that leptin signalling regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation and the expression of M1 markers in the ovaries of obese mice in an ObRb-dependent and ObRb-independent manner. Furthermore, we found no changes in the expression of leptin signalling and NLRP3 inflammasome genes in GCs from db/db and ob/ob mice, which was associated with no effects on macrophage infiltration genes, despite the dysregulation of genes associated with steroidogenesis in homozygous obese db/db. Our results suggest that: (i) the crosstalk between leptin signalling, NLRP3 inflammasome and macrophage infiltration takes place in ovarian components other than the GC compartment; and (ii) transcriptional changes in GCs from homozygous obese ob/ob mice suggest structural rearrangement and organisation, whereas in db/db mice the impairment in steroidogenesis and secretory activity.